Was the 6 week dosing interval change to 3 weeks in New Zealand related to the newly announced government goal to get 90% of the eligible population vaccinated in 2021?
And there is no real world data to show conclusively that it even mitigates or minimizes the number of infections or severity of disease, but there are numerous adverse events being reported.
You can still develop long covid
And excess deaths and other illnesses and syndromes sky rocket afterwards.
What was the political purpose of ensuring a 90% uptake?
ah an attempt to continue the hubris of 'being the best' and a true believer's test, if everyone takes part - who is left to criticise? but i do think they sincerely believed the more people vaccinated the better the result for new zealand -which has far more to do with the omicron variant than vaccination.
But what gets me, is the silencing of very sound safety signals.
Censorship of any rational arguments.
I couldn't even ask questions without being censored.
And as a guy who has spent the last decade studying industrial incidents of which there are many notable in our recent history, especially since the turn of the 20th century.
With a special focus on chronic toxicity after those incidents.
And a particular focus on mitochondrial DNA dysfunction and how cellular homeostasis is disrupted leading to a number of incurable syndromes.
I had a few questions which are not conspiracy theories but are well documented historical events.
What political motive would want to turn of the safety alarms and ignore any rational arguments and or even the questions which get people to think?
Why did they lie and downplay a number of these concerns without any data to support it?
Again, I am sure a number wouldn't even know this. I don't expect politicians to contemplate these subjects.
But doctors, scientists, professionals with an understanding of chemical, biological and radiological toxicology should have had an inclination towards this.
Especially when the disease itself was only a threat to a small portion of our population and the long covid concern itself is almost certainly one of these mitochondrial damaging syndromes.
Strange that some people developed a very similar condition after inoculation.
Perhaps a strong indicator that the spike protein itself is the mechanism that leads to cellular and mitochondrial dysfunction.
And if mitochondria are damaged, what are the knock on effects?
Protein misfolding, tissue inflammation, the rapid onset of age related conditions, fatigue, brain fog and inflammation.
And do these syndromes all start immediately, or like most genotoxic incidents, asbestos, dioxin etcetera, are the symptoms and syndromes expected to appear immediately... Or years later?
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
If it doesn't stop infection.
You can still die "fully vaccinated"
And there is no real world data to show conclusively that it even mitigates or minimizes the number of infections or severity of disease, but there are numerous adverse events being reported.
You can still develop long covid
And excess deaths and other illnesses and syndromes sky rocket afterwards.
What was the political purpose of ensuring a 90% uptake?
ah an attempt to continue the hubris of 'being the best' and a true believer's test, if everyone takes part - who is left to criticise? but i do think they sincerely believed the more people vaccinated the better the result for new zealand -which has far more to do with the omicron variant than vaccination.
Perhaps and I am sure many did think that.
But what gets me, is the silencing of very sound safety signals.
Censorship of any rational arguments.
I couldn't even ask questions without being censored.
And as a guy who has spent the last decade studying industrial incidents of which there are many notable in our recent history, especially since the turn of the 20th century.
With a special focus on chronic toxicity after those incidents.
And a particular focus on mitochondrial DNA dysfunction and how cellular homeostasis is disrupted leading to a number of incurable syndromes.
I had a few questions which are not conspiracy theories but are well documented historical events.
What political motive would want to turn of the safety alarms and ignore any rational arguments and or even the questions which get people to think?
Why did they lie and downplay a number of these concerns without any data to support it?
Again, I am sure a number wouldn't even know this. I don't expect politicians to contemplate these subjects.
But doctors, scientists, professionals with an understanding of chemical, biological and radiological toxicology should have had an inclination towards this.
Especially when the disease itself was only a threat to a small portion of our population and the long covid concern itself is almost certainly one of these mitochondrial damaging syndromes.
Strange that some people developed a very similar condition after inoculation.
Perhaps a strong indicator that the spike protein itself is the mechanism that leads to cellular and mitochondrial dysfunction.
And if mitochondria are damaged, what are the knock on effects?
Protein misfolding, tissue inflammation, the rapid onset of age related conditions, fatigue, brain fog and inflammation.
And do these syndromes all start immediately, or like most genotoxic incidents, asbestos, dioxin etcetera, are the symptoms and syndromes expected to appear immediately... Or years later?
It just makes me so mad.
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
Find the article
Jane333.Substack.com